Evolutionarily stable nesting strategy in a digger wasp.

Two alternative “strategies” will not coexist in a population unless on average they are equally successful. The most likely way for such an equilibrium to be maintained is through something equivalent to frequencydependent selection. Females of the digger wasp Sphex ichneumoneus (Sphecidae) nest in underground burrows. They usually dig and provision these by themselves but occasionally a nest is jointly occupied. The two wasps fight whenever they meet and in the end only one of the two females lays an egg in the shared nest. Two models based on the theory of mixed evolutionarily stable strategies were developed and tested on comprehensive field data from two North American populations of these wasps. The first model proposes two strategies called founding and joining. Founders start burrows alone, but they are more successful when they are joined by a joiner. At equilibrium founders and joiners are equally successful, which amounts to an amicable, sharing relationship. The predictions of this amicable model are decisively rejected by the data. The second model proposes two strategies called digging and entering. Diggers dig their own burrows but they often have to abandon these burrows because of temporary unsuitability. Enterers move in later, thereby exploiting abandoned burrows as a valuable resource. They do not distinguish an adandoned burrow from one that is still occupied. Therefore sharing of burrows arises as an unfortunate byproduct of selection for entering abandoned burrows, and Mode1 2 is not an amicable model. Its quantitative predictions are impressively fulfilled in one population, though not in another population. This is one of the only examples yet known of a mixed evolutionarily stable strategy in nature. Yet the word strategy itself can confuse. and this paper tries the experiment of substituting “decision”, defined as a moment at which the animal commits future time to a course of action.